Blogs

India, with its large population and diversity in culture, faces difficulties to ensure equitable access to justice. From a very long-time justice system has faced several criticisms for being outdated, bureaucratic, and inaccessible to the common man particularly to the poor, women and those in remote areas. However, in these recent years came out with the digital revolution which slowly begun to change the picture of Indian legal landscape, for example bringing system aimed at making justice quicker and accessible to citizens which is more citizen centric. Where in this journey of Zero FIR to E-FIR, this reflects the change and transition of India’s technology-enabled justice delivery to the people of India.

India the country known for its rich diversity in culture over the passage of time has seen the deteriorating condition of women. To empower women and bring them to the mainstream society in equal level to men. Many women centric laws were made to empower them. Although with the passage of decades the same laws are misused and used by women against men to commit crime and play the victim’s card. 

From a man accused of sexual assault being asked to get a rakhi tied on his wrist by the victim thus, attempting to convert a ‘molester’ to a ‘brother’ by judicial mandate to preventing an accused from participating in political activities, conditional bail orders have time and again proved themselves as being a synonym of ‘absurdity’ as the conditions imposed were so unusual that even their performance became a subject of mockery and debate all across the civil society

Implicit biasness is a term which refers to the subconscious behaviour or stereotypical approach that affect one’s understanding, actions, and decisions. In the fields of law these biases hinder in the way of justice and undermine the fundamental principle of equality before the law, provided in Article 14 of Constitution of India. Globally the discourse focuses on the impact of implicit bias on the jury selection and verdicts. India’s unique judicial system ensures a tailored exploration of this problem.

Chatbots are often used to guide consumers in selecting a product by providing them with requisite information about the products or services they are interested in purchasing. However, this mode of sale of goods poses a threat to compromise the rights of a buyer, which arises from the likelihood of such chatbots furnishing incorrect or fallacious information

A distinctive characteristic of common law systems is their steadfastness on adherence to procedures. Hence, judges draw judgements from institutionalised opinions and interpretations from other judicial authorities. This can give rise to situations in which justice may not be fully delivered to the aggrieved. To mitigate situations where justice is not fully delivered to the aggrieved, Article 142, which bestowed upon the Supreme Court