Case Analysis

The case Navtej Singh Johar vs. Union of India (2018) is a landmark judgment delivered by the Supreme Court of India that marked a major step towards the recognition and protection of the rights of the LGBTQIA+ community in India. This judgment decriminalized consensual same-sex relations between adults by striking down Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) to the extent that it criminalized such acts.

In this case there is alleged trademark infringement of the trademark which held by the Plaintiff. Trademark is very important in each industry as it helps the particular business market their particular good so that it can be attractive to the customers. Therefore, it is important to take protective measures when a business get s to know about any alleged infringement which may be taking place.

The landmark judgment “State of Punjab v. Davinder Singh” was delivered by the hon’ble Supreme Court of India on 1st August 2024 which ruled that states can be allowed to make sub-classification within the Schedule Castes and Schedule Tribes for caste-based reservations. The ruling was made by a seven-judge bench headed by then Chief Justice of India Justice D.Y. Chandrachud and comprising Justices B.R. Gavai, Vikram Nath, Bela M. Trivedi, Pankaj Mithal, Manoj Misra and Satish Chandra Sharma where 6:1 majory in favor of the verdict with a dissenting opinion by justice Bela M. Trivedi.

On 2nd August of 1926, an unprecedented collision took place before midnight between a French vessel named Lotus and a Turkish collier Boz – Kourt and eventually caused the unfortunate death of eight Turkish nationals who were on board the Turkish collier. A French citizen, named Monsieur Demons captained the French mail steamer. The remaining 10 survivors of the Boz – Kourt including its captain, Hassan Bey were taken aboard the Lotus.

The state is required under the Preamble and other constitutional articles of the Indian Constitution to create an equal society for all Indian citizens. Under the heading Directive Principles of State Policy in Part IV of the Constitution, these duties are covered in depth. Part IV begins with Article 37, which states that although the section is not enforceable in court, it is essential to the nation’s governance. Therefore, the Parliament must use these clauses while enacting laws. Industry management by the state was viewed as a fantastic way to further socialist goals.

In this case, the institutional gender bias of the Indian Army in awarding female officers permanent commissions (PC) was contested.
In 1992, the Indian Army granted permission for female officers to serve in the Army Education Corps Signals and Engineers and other sections of the Short Service Commission (SSC).