ROLE OF MEDIA IN INFLUENCING THE JUDICIARY IN INDIA

Garv Jagyasi, Student, BVDU New Law College, Pune

Introduction –

The media is often seen as the fourth pillar of democracy, essential for promoting transparency, accountability, and public awareness in governance and societal issues. Historically, this function was carried out by print and broadcast media, which acted as a bridge between the public and various institutions, including the judiciary. However, with the rise of digital technology, this landscape has transformed dramatically, leading to a new era dominated by social media platforms. These platforms, known for their immediacy, extensive reach, and interactive features, have changed the way information is shared and consumed. In India, social media has emerged as a formidable force in shaping public opinion, particularly regarding judicial matters. Platforms such as Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube facilitate real-time conversations and elevate legal issues, often galvanizing widespread support or outrage. Campaigns advocating for justice for crime victims or highlighting systemic flaws frequently gain momentum, compelling authorities to respond. A notable example is the public outcry surrounding the Nirbhaya case, where collective indignation sparked significant legal and societal reforms.

Nevertheless, this influence carries both advantages and drawbacks. While social media enhances access to information and encourages civic participation, it also brings challenges like misinformation, sensationalism, and potential threats to judicial independence. Therefore, the role of social media in the judiciary is both empowering and problematic, necessitating a careful balance between promoting transparency and protecting judicial impartiality. This blog delves into these intricate dynamics within the Indian context. The purpose of this study is to analyze the dual-edged impact of social media on the judiciary in India. The objective is to explore how social media platforms influence judicial functioning, assess the legal and ethical implications, and propose measures to mitigate adverse effects while leveraging positive contributions. By doing so, the analysis aims to contribute to the broader discourse on maintaining a robust judiciary in the face of evolving digital challenges.

Historical View on Media’s Impact on the Judiciary – 

Historically, print and electronic media acted as watchdogs, offering impartial coverage of court proceedings to promote transparency and accountability. Significant events like the Kesavananda Bharati Case (1973) and the Bhopal Gas Tragedy (1984) demonstrated how traditional media could sway public opinion and inspire judicial changes. These outlets adhered to ethical standards, maintaining respect for the judicial system.

The rise of social media has increased the media’s impact on the judiciary. Instant updates, tweets, and viral content often lead to parallel “media trials,” putting pressure on the courts. The Sushant Singh Rajput Death Case (2020) showed how social media campaigns influenced public narratives before legal outcomes were determined. Platforms like Twitter and Facebook have made it easier for people to share opinions, but they also raise issues of misinformation and biased narratives that can threaten judicial independence.

While social media can enhance transparency, it also poses risks to the judiciary by fostering bias, pressuring judges, and endangering fair trials. Finding a balance between free expression and the integrity of the judiciary is essential. The media’s role should support, not undermine, the justice system in India.

Social Media as a Tool for Judicial Influence – 

Social media has become a strong force in shaping court decisions in India. Platforms such as Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube provide quick access, allowing millions to express their views, share complaints, and seek accountability instantly. This quick response often leads to widespread public discussions, sometimes pushing the courts to act more quickly.

One major benefit of social media is that it amplifies the voices of those who are often overlooked and brings attention to injustices that might not be seen otherwise. It acts as a space for victims and activists to gather support, influence public opinion, and push for action from institutions. For example, in the Nirbhaya Case (2012), the national outrage driven by social media campaigns forced the courts to speed up the trial and issue a strong verdict.

Similarly, movements like #JusticeForAsifa and #JusticeForSSR gained momentum, leading to court actions in the Kathua rape case (2018) and the Sushant Singh Rajput case (2020). These campaigns revealed systemic issues, urging the courts to provide timely justice. However, while social media can highlight important issues, it also risks oversimplifying complicated cases, which may affect the fairness of judicial processes. Public pressure can turn into “media trials,” threatening the essential principle of impartial justice. The influence of social media on the judiciary shows its mixed nature: it can empower and hold institutions accountable, but it can also introduce bias and disruption. This calls for a careful approach to maintain the independence of the judiciary while promoting transparency and responsiveness.

Challenges Presented by Social Media – 

Social media has transformed the landscape of communication, providing a venue for public dialogue; however, its unchecked power presents considerable challenges for the judiciary in India. One major concern is the phenomenon of Trial by Media, where social media amplifies public sentiment, often undermining judicial impartiality. Viral content, trending topics, and widespread public indignation can exert undue influence on judges, potentially affecting their decisions or tarnishing the perception of fairness. The sensational portrayal of legal cases on social media often oversimplifies complex issues, reducing them to divisive narratives.

Additionally, the spread of Misinformation and Fake News significantly damages the credibility of the judiciary. Unverified information and misleading narratives circulating online can confuse the public and diminish trust in judicial institutions. The swift dissemination of false information intensifies this issue, leading to uncertainty and skepticism regarding judicial decisions. Moreover, the challenge of Contempt of Court is heightened by social media, as online remarks and posts can prejudice ongoing legal proceedings. Notable instances include contempt charges against individuals for their online comments about judges or rulings, illustrating the judiciary’s difficulty in balancing the right to free speech with the need to uphold judicial integrity. While social media serves as a potent instrument for democratizing information, its potential for misuse creates challenges that necessitate regulatory intervention. It is essential to protect judicial independence and the integrity of legal processes from the pervasive influence of digital platforms, ensuring that justice remains insulated from public and media pressures.

Legal Frameworks surrounding the topic –

The relationship between media and the judiciary in India is crucial, particularly with the increasing impact of social media. The Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 outlines the restrictions on media commentary regarding judicial matters. This legislation aims to strike a balance between the right to free speech and the respect for the judiciary by imposing penalties on publications or actions that could compromise or interfere with judicial proceedings. In the context of the digital age, the Information Technology Act, 2000 governs online platforms, including social media. Section 79 grants intermediaries protection from liability if they exercise due diligence, while Section 69A permits the blocking of access to content that threatens national security, public order, or could lead to contempt of court. These regulations are designed to prevent the misuse of social media that could mislead or sway ongoing judicial cases. Judicial rulings highlight the media’s complex role. In the case of Sahara India Real Estate v. SEBI (2012), the Supreme Court allowed for the delay of publication to ensure a fair trial. In R. Rajagopal v. State of Tamil Nadu (1994), the court affirmed the freedom of the press while emphasizing the need for accountability. Conversely, in Arunesh Kumar v. State of Bihar (2021), the judiciary warned against sensationalism that could bias legal proceedings.

While social media enhances public engagement, it also poses risks of misrepresenting issues related to ongoing cases. Although it promotes transparency, unchecked commentary can undermine judicial impartiality. Maintaining a balance between Article 19(1)(a) (freedom of speech) and Article 21 (right to a fair trial) is essential, requiring careful regulation to protect judicial independence. Legal Framework Governing Media and Judiciary in India Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. IT Act, 2000: Regulations on digital platforms. Judicial precedents on media freedom and restrictions. 

Balancing Act: Freedom of Speech vs. Judicial Independence – 

In India, the influence of media, particularly social media, on the judiciary has emerged as a critical concern, highlighting the need to balance freedom of expression with judicial independence. Media outlets, especially social media platforms, provide a vast and often unregulated arena for public discussion. While freedom of speech is fundamental to democracy, it is essential that this freedom is exercised with caution, especially in relation to ongoing judicial matters. The judiciary is responsible for maintaining the rule of law and delivering unbiased justice, shielded from outside pressures. However, the rise of social media has brought forth new challenges, as these platforms are frequently utilized to express opinions on active cases or to criticize judges and the judicial system. Such actions can shape public perceptions that may jeopardize the integrity of legal proceedings. It is vital for the judicial system to remain insulated from media trials, where public opinion may form judgments prior to official rulings. Additionally, the judiciary has a pivotal role in managing the impact of social media. Indian courts have intervened in instances involving defamatory remarks or hate speech disseminated through digital channels, emphasizing the necessity of protecting judicial processes from media influence. Social media platforms must acknowledge the significant effect their content can have on public views of the judiciary, while the judiciary must uphold its independence, ensuring that justice is not influenced by public sentiment or media portrayals. Achieving a proper equilibrium between freedom of expression and the protection of judicial impartiality is crucial for maintaining the integrity of India’s legal framework.

Practical Implications – 

The topic of the role of media, particularly social media, in influencing the judiciary in India is highly relevant for legal practitioners, policymakers, and students in various ways. For legal practitioners, lawyers and judges must navigate the complex intersection of media influence and legal procedures. They need to understand the implications of public opinion shaped by social media, especially in high-profile cases. Legal professionals must ensure impartiality and fairness while being aware of how media coverage could affect the perception of their cases or professional integrity. Additionally, they must stay informed about evolving legal frameworks related to media regulation, especially concerning defamation, hate speech, or contempt of court issues tied to social media.

For policymakers, this issue raises important questions about how to regulate social media in a way that balances free speech with protecting judicial independence. Policymakers must consider laws that limit harmful media influence, such as guidelines for reporting ongoing cases or addressing misinformation. They also need to ensure that laws protecting the judiciary’s impartiality do not infringe upon freedom of expression. Understanding this balance is key to shaping future legislation related to both the media and the judiciary.

For students, particularly law students, this issue helps them grasp the delicate relationship between the judiciary, media, and public opinion. Students must critically engage with issues like freedom of speech, contempt of court, and the role of digital platforms in shaping legal outcomes. Studying this topic allows students to appreciate broader societal and ethical considerations in legal practice, preparing them for future roles in litigation and policymaking.

Conclusion – 

The impact of social media on the judiciary in India poses a significant challenge to maintaining the equilibrium between freedom of expression and judicial autonomy. Although media is vital for encouraging public dialogue, its unregulated influence may jeopardize the fairness and objectivity of legal processes. It is crucial for legal professionals, policymakers, and students to grasp the changing dynamics between media and the judiciary to protect the integrity of the legal framework. Achieving an appropriate balance through responsible media conduct, strong regulations, and a dedication to impartial justice is vital for upholding the rule of law and ensuring the credibility of India’s judicial system.

References – 

1. Aqib, Mohd., and Utkarsh Dwivedi. “Judiciary and Media Trial: A Need for Balance.” Indian Journal of Law and Human Behavior, vol. 5, no. 2, May-Aug. 2019, pp. 155–161. Red Flower Publication Pvt. Ltd., https://doi.org/10.21088/ijlhb.2454.7107.5219.8.
2. https://mandjservice.com/blogs/blog/social-media-and-indias-judiciary-an-evolving-relationship?srsltid=AfmBOooAbUk8snI8fSt5NzW3B2hGG50aQHYNELLf-4J1wFakvzhUrGqm 
3. Mehta, Pratap Bhanu. “The Role of Media in Influencing the Judiciary.” The Indian Express, 25 Jan. 2020, www.indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/media-judiciary-constitutional-democracy-6235146/.
4. Baxi, Upendra. “Judicial Independence and the Role of Media in India.” Economic and Political Weekly, vol. 54, no. 9, 2019, pp. 45-52.
5. Venkatesan, J. “Social Media and Its Impact on the Judiciary: A Legal Perspective.” Journal of Media and Law, vol. 28, no. 3, 2018, pp. 183-199.